Techtonica is a first-person factory automation game set beneath the surface of an alien planet. Designed for single-player or cooperative gameplay, it offers an immersive experience of building factories, gathering resources, researching new technologies, molding the terrain, establishing bases, and uncovering secrets. However, there have been concerns raised about the choice of engine for this game, leading to questions about its limitations and potential issues. In this article, we will explore why some consider Techtonica’s engine to be inadequate and what hopes lie in addressing these limitations in the future.

The choice of engine for a game plays a crucial role in its development and performance. In the case of Techtonica, the engine used has been criticized by some as being inferior. The question arises: Why was this “junk” engine chosen? Comparisons are made to other games such as “Satisfactory” that started directly on Unreal Engine 4 or even now on Unreal Engine 5, which allegedly has fewer limitations. This has led to the perception that a fatal mistake was made in selecting the engine for Techtonica.

One of the primary reasons for the criticism of Techtonica’s engine is its perceived limitations and associated problems. While the specifics of these limitations may vary depending on individual opinions, there are certain common concerns that have been raised. These include issues regarding graphics quality, performance optimization, scalability, and modding support. Critics argue that these aspects are vital for a game to succeed in the competitive market, and the engine’s shortcomings in these areas hinder Techtonica’s potential.

Despite the concerns surrounding Techtonica’s engine choice, there is still optimism about the game’s future and the potential for addressing the limitations. Developers have the opportunity to learn from the feedback and iterate upon the existing engine to overcome its weaknesses. The community’s engagement and support can play a significant role in shaping the direction of Techtonica and enabling the game to evolve into a more robust and satisfying experience. By actively listening to player feedback and addressing the identified shortcomings, the developers can inject new life into Techtonica and establish it as a successful game within the genre.

While the choice of engine for Techtonica may have raised concerns and led to criticism, it is important to recognize that game development is an iterative process. No engine is perfect, and addressing limitations is a common challenge faced by developers. The key lies in the ability to learn from mistakes, listen to the community, and actively work towards improving the game. With the right approach and dedication, Techtonica has the potential to rise above its perceived limitations and deliver an exceptional gaming experience.